↓ Skip to main content

Computational study of transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on patient-specific models—rapid surgical planning for self-expanding valves

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational study of transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on patient-specific models—rapid surgical planning for self-expanding valves
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2024.1407215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhuangyuan Meng, Haishan Zhang, Yunhan Cai, Yuan Gao, Changbin Liang, Jun Wang, Xin Chen, Liang Guo, ShengZhang Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2024.
All research outputs
#23,435,912
of 26,108,988 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#10,742
of 15,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,587
of 164,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#31
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,108,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.