The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The arrhythmic substrate of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using ECG imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2024.1428709 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji-Jian Chow, Kevin M. W. Leong, Matthew Shun-Shin, Sian Jones, Oliver P. Guttmann, Saidi A. Mohiddin, Pier Lambiase, Perry M. Elliott, Julian O. M. Ormerod, Michael Koa-Wing, David Lefroy, Phang Boon Lim, Nicholas W. F. Linton, Fu Siong Ng, Norman A. Qureshi, Zachary I. Whinnett, Nicholas S. Peters, Darrel P. Francis, Amanda M. Varnava, Prapa Kanagaratnam |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#20,827,180
of 26,462,556 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,371
of 15,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,267
of 133,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#37
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,462,556 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.