↓ Skip to main content

Effects of intermittent seating upright, lower body negative pressure, and exercise on functional tasks performance after head-down tilt bed rest

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of intermittent seating upright, lower body negative pressure, and exercise on functional tasks performance after head-down tilt bed rest
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2024.1442239
Authors

Gilles Clément, Sarah C. Moudy, Timothy R. Macaulay, Edwin Mulder, Scott J. Wood

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,141,986
of 26,601,484 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,626
of 15,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,450
of 144,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#8
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,601,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.