↓ Skip to main content

Unraveling the Structure of Viral Replication Complexes at Super-Resolution

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unraveling the Structure of Viral Replication Complexes at Super-Resolution
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga Linnik, Johannes Liesche, Jens Tilsner, Karl J. Oparka

Abstract

During infection, many RNA viruses produce characteristic inclusion bodies that contain both viral and host components. These structures were first described over a century ago and originally termed "X-bodies," as their function was not immediately appreciated. Whilst some inclusion bodies may represent cytopathic by-products of viral protein over-accumulation, X-bodies have emerged as virus "factories," quasi-organelles that coordinate diverse viral infection processes such as replication, protein expression, evasion of host defenses, virion assembly, and intercellular transport. Accordingly, they are now generally referred to as viral replication complexes (VRCs). We previously used confocal fluorescence microscopy to unravel the complex structure of X-bodies produced by Potato virus X (PVX). Here we used 3D-structured illumination (3D-SIM) super-resolution microscopy to map the PVX X-body at a finer scale. We identify a previously unrecognized membrane structure induced by the PVX "triple gene block" (TGB) proteins, providing new insights into the complex interplay between virus and host within the X-body.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 92 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Professor 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2013.
All research outputs
#17,677,535
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,831
of 19,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,115
of 280,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#172
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,898 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.