↓ Skip to main content

Integrating nitric oxide into salicylic acid and jasmonic acid/ ethylene plant defense pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating nitric oxide into salicylic acid and jasmonic acid/ ethylene plant defense pathways
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis A. J. Mur, Elena Prats, Sandra Pierre, Michael A. Hall, Kim H. Hebelstrup

Abstract

Plant defense against pests and pathogens is known to be conferred by either salicylic acid (SA) or jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET) pathways, depending on infection or herbivore-grazing strategy. It is well attested that SA and JA/ET pathways are mutually antagonistic allowing defense responses to be tailored to particular biotic stresses. Nitric oxide (NO) has emerged as a major signal influencing resistance mediated by both signaling pathways but no attempt has been made to integrate NO into established SA/JA/ET interactions. NO has been shown to act as an inducer or suppressor of signaling along each pathway. NO will initiate SA biosynthesis and nitrosylate key cysteines on TGA-class transcription factors to aid in the initiation of SA-dependent gene expression. Against this, S-nitrosylation of NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEINS1 (NPR1) will promote the NPR1 oligomerization within the cytoplasm to reduce TGA activation. In JA biosynthesis, NO will initiate the expression of JA biosynthetic enzymes, presumably to over-come any antagonistic effects of SA on JA-mediated transcription. NO will also initiate the expression of ET biosynthetic genes but a suppressive role is also observed in the S-nitrosylation and inhibition of S-adenosylmethionine transferases which provides methyl groups for ET production. Based on these data a model for NO action is proposed but we have also highlighted the need to understand when and how inductive and suppressive steps are used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 254 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 27%
Researcher 48 18%
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Environmental Science 2 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 49 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#13,891,295
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,195
of 19,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,384
of 280,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#113
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.