↓ Skip to main content

Effector candidates in the secretome of Piriformospora indica, a ubiquitous plant-associated fungus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effector candidates in the secretome of Piriformospora indica, a ubiquitous plant-associated fungus
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryam Rafiqi, Lukas Jelonek, Ndifor F. Akum, Feng Zhang, Karl-Heinz Kogel

Abstract

One of the emerging systems in plant-microbe interaction is the study of proteins, referred to as effectors, secreted by microbes in order to modulate host cells function and structure and to promote microbial growth on plant tissue. Current knowledge on fungal effectors derives mainly from biotrophic and hemibiotrophic plant fungal pathogens that have a limited host range. Here, we focus on effectors of Piriformospora indica, a soil borne endophyte forming intimate associations with roots of a wide range of plant species. Complete genome sequencing provides an opportunity to investigate the role of effectors during the interaction of this mutualistic fungus with plants. We describe in silico analyses to predict effectors of P. indica and we explore effector features considered here to mine a high priority protein list for functional analysis.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 110 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 29%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,711
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,570
of 19,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,040
of 280,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#216
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,950 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.