↓ Skip to main content

Hormonal networks involved in apical hook development in darkness and their response to light

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hormonal networks involved in apical hook development in darkness and their response to light
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria A. Mazzella, Jorge J. Casal, Jorge P. Muschietti, Ana R. Fox

Abstract

In darkness, the dicot seedlings produce an apical hook as result of differential cell division and extension at opposite sides of the hypocotyl. This hook protects the apical meristem from mechanical damage during seedling emergence from the soil. In darkness, gibberellins act via the DELLA-PIF (PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORs) pathway, and ethylene acts via the EIN3/EIL1 (ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 3/EIN3 like 1)-HLS1 (HOOKLESS 1) pathway to control the asymmetric accumulation of auxin required for apical hook formation and maintenance. These core pathways form a network with multiple points of connection. Light perception by phytochromes and cryptochromes reduces the activity of PIFs and (COP1) CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1-both required for hook formation in darkness-, lowers the levels of gibberellins, and triggers hook opening as a component of the switch between heterotrophic and photoautotrophic development. Apical hook opening is thus a suitable model to study the convergence of endogenous and exogenous signals on the control of cell division and cell growth.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 25%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Master 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 42 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 16%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Chemistry 2 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 46 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#19,715
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,470
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#44
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.