↓ Skip to main content

Metal species involved in long distance metal transport in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metal species involved in long distance metal transport in plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Álvarez-Fernández, Pablo Díaz-Benito, Anunciación Abadía, Ana-Flor López-Millán, Javier Abadía

Abstract

The mechanisms plants use to transport metals from roots to shoots are not completely understood. It has long been proposed that organic molecules participate in metal translocation within the plant. However, until recently the identity of the complexes involved in the long-distance transport of metals could only be inferred by using indirect methods, such as analyzing separately the concentrations of metals and putative ligands and then using in silico chemical speciation software to predict metal species. Molecular biology approaches also have provided a breadth of information about putative metal ligands and metal complexes occurring in plant fluids. The new advances in analytical techniques based on mass spectrometry and the increased use of synchrotron X-ray spectroscopy have allowed for the identification of some metal-ligand species in plant fluids such as the xylem and phloem saps. Also, some proteins present in plant fluids can bind metals and a few studies have explored this possibility. This study reviews the analytical challenges researchers have to face to understand long-distance metal transport in plants as well as the recent advances in the identification of the ligand and metal-ligand complexes in plant fluids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 9 6%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 32%
Environmental Science 21 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 12%
Chemistry 15 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#21,628,473
of 24,140,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#18,195
of 22,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,833
of 228,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#49
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,140,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.