↓ Skip to main content

There and back again, or always there? The evolution of rice combined strategy for Fe uptake

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
There and back again, or always there? The evolution of rice combined strategy for Fe uptake
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felipe K. Ricachenevsky, Raul A. Sperotto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 23%
Engineering 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#21,505,751
of 26,397,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#17,446
of 25,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,513
of 243,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#83
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,397,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.