↓ Skip to main content

Mechanosensitive channels: feeling tension in a world under pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanosensitive channels: feeling tension in a world under pressure
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rémi Peyronnet, Daniel Tran, Tiffanie Girault, Jean-Marie Frachisse

Abstract

Plants, like other organisms, are facing multiple mechanical constraints generated both in their tissues and by the surrounding environments. They need to sense and adapt to these forces throughout their lifetimes. To do so, different mechanisms devoted to force transduction have emerged. Here we focus on fascinating proteins: the mechanosensitive (MS) channels. Mechanosensing in plants has been described for centuries but the molecular identification of MS channels occurred only recently. This review is aimed at plant biologists and plant biomechanists who want to be introduced to MS channel identity, how they work and what they might do in planta? In this review, electrophysiological properties, regulations, and functions of well-characterized MS channels belonging to bacteria and animals are compared with those of plants. Common and specific properties are discussed. We deduce which tools and concepts from animal and bacterial fields could be helpful for improving our understanding of plant mechanotransduction. MS channels embedded in their plasma membrane are sandwiched between the cell wall and the cytoskeleton. The consequences of this peculiar situation are analyzed and discussed. We also stress how important it is to probe mechanical forces at cellular and subcellular levels in planta in order to reveal the intimate relationship linking the membrane with MS channel activity. Finally we will propose new tracks to help to reveal their physiological functions at tissue and plant levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 244 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 24%
Researcher 52 20%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 17%
Engineering 21 8%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Physics and Astronomy 9 4%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 55 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12,892
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,058
of 273,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#122
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.