↓ Skip to main content

Light as stress factor to plant roots – case of root halotropism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Light as stress factor to plant roots – case of root halotropism
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken Yokawa, Rossella Fasano, Tomoko Kagenishi, František Baluška

Abstract

Despite growing underground, largely in darkness, roots emerge to be very sensitive to light. Recently, several important papers have been published which reveal that plant roots not only express all known light receptors but also that their growth, physiology and adaptive stress responses are light-sensitive. In Arabidopsis, illumination of roots speeds-up root growth via reactive oxygen species-mediated and F-actin dependent process. On the other hand, keeping Arabidopsis roots in darkness alters F-actin distribution, polar localization of PIN proteins as well as polar transport of auxin. Several signaling components activated by phytohormones are overlapping with light-related signaling cascade. We demonstrated that the sensitivity of roots to salinity is altered in the light-grown Arabidopsis roots. Particularly, light-exposed roots are less effective in their salt-avoidance behavior known as root halotropism. Here we discuss these new aspects of light-mediated root behavior from cellular, physiological and evolutionary perspectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 24%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 13%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Chemistry 2 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,788,891
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,558
of 24,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,110
of 363,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#50
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.