The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Signal regulators of systemic acquired resistance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00228 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qing-Ming Gao, Shifeng Zhu, Pradeep Kachroo, Aardra Kachroo |
| Abstract |
Salicylic acid (SA) is an important phytohormone that plays a vital role in a number of physiological responses, including plant defense. The last two decades have witnessed a number of breakthroughs related to biosynthesis, transport, perception and signaling mediated by SA. These findings demonstrate that SA plays a crictical role in both local and systemic defense responses. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is one such SA-dependent response. SAR is a long distance signaling mechanism that provides broad spectrum and long-lasting resistance to secondary infections throughout the plant. This unique feature makes SAR a highly desirable trait in crop production. This review summarizes the recent advances in the role of SA in SAR and discusses its relationship to other SAR inducers. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 463 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 103 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 81 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 12% |
| Researcher | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 9% |
| Other | 46 | 10% |
| Unknown | 98 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 243 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 100 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Chemistry | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 112 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,329,087
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#10,807
of 20,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,520
of 264,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#135
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.