You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RNA around the clock – regulation at the RNA level in biological timing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00311 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Nolte, Dorothee Staiger |
| Abstract |
The circadian timing system in plants synchronizes their physiological functions with the environment. This is achieved by a global control of gene expression programs with a considerable part of the transcriptome undergoing 24-h oscillations in steady-state abundance. These circadian oscillations are driven by a set of core clock proteins that generate their own 24-h rhythm through periodic feedback on their own transcription. Additionally, post-transcriptional events are instrumental for oscillations of core clock genes and genes in clock output. Here we provide an update on molecular events at the RNA level that contribute to the 24-h rhythm of the core clock proteins and shape the circadian transcriptome. We focus on the circadian system of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana but also discuss selected regulatory principles in other organisms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 34% |
| Researcher | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 21% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,517,992
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,372
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,033
of 279,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#81
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.