↓ Skip to main content

Role of proline in cell wall synthesis and plant development and its implications in plant ontogeny

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
247 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of proline in cell wall synthesis and plant development and its implications in plant ontogeny
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00544
Pubmed ID
Authors

Polavarapu B. Kavi Kishor, P. Hima Kumari, M. S. L. Sunita, Nese Sreenivasulu

Abstract

Proline is a proteogenic amino acid and accumulates both under stress and non-stress conditions as a beneficial solute in plants. Recent discoveries point out that proline plays an important role in plant growth and differentiation across life cycle. It is a key determinant of many cell wall proteins that plays important roles in plant development. The role of extensins, arabinogalactan proteins and hydroxyproline- and proline-rich proteins as important components of cell wall proteins that play pivotal roles in cell wall signal transduction cascades, plant development and stress tolerance is discussed in this review. Molecular insights are also provided here into the plausible roles of proline transporters modulating key events in plant development. In addition, the roles of proline during seed developmental transitions including storage protein synthesis are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 21%
Researcher 44 15%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 69 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 16%
Chemistry 6 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 81 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,218,678
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,443
of 20,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,538
of 353,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#45
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.