The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lipid Extracted Microalgal Biomass Residue as a Fertilizer Substitute for Zea mays L.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.01266 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rahulkumar Maurya, Kaumeel Chokshi, Tonmoy Ghosh, Khanjan Trivedi, Imran Pancha, Denish Kubavat, Sandhya Mishra, Arup Ghosh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
Researcher | 20 | 13% |
Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 7% |
Chemical Engineering | 10 | 7% |
Engineering | 9 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 11% |
Unknown | 47 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,327,131
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,254
of 25,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,372
of 407,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#168
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.