↓ Skip to main content

Calcium Sensors as Key Hubs in Plant Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calcium Sensors as Key Hubs in Plant Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benoît Ranty, Didier Aldon, Valérie Cotelle, Jean-Philippe Galaud, Patrice Thuleau, Christian Mazars

Abstract

The Ca(2+) ion is recognized as a crucial second messenger in signaling pathways coupling the perception of environmental stimuli to plant adaptive responses. Indeed, one of the earliest events following the perception of environmental changes (temperature, salt stress, drought, pathogen, or herbivore attack) is intracellular variation of free calcium concentrations. These calcium variations differ in their spatio-temporal characteristics (subcellular location, amplitude, kinetics) with the nature and strength of the stimulus and, for this reason, they are considered as signatures encrypting information from the initial stimulus. This information is believed to drive a specific response by decoding via calcium-binding proteins. Based on recent examples, we illustrate how individual calcium sensors from the calcium-dependent protein kinase and calmodulin-like protein families can integrate inputs from various environmental changes. Focusing on members of these two families, shown to be involved in plant responses to both abiotic and biotic stimuli, we discuss their role as key hubs and we put forward hypotheses explaining how they can drive the signaling pathways toward the appropriate plant responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 265 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 25%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 60 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 19%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Chemistry 3 1%
Unspecified 2 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 76 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,102,100
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,007
of 24,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,227
of 315,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#40
of 525 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,721 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 525 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.