You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Response of the Root Apex in Plant Adaptation to Iron Heterogeneity in Soil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2016.00344 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guangjie Li, Herbert J. Kronzucker, Weiming Shi |
Abstract |
Iron (Fe) is an essential micronutrient for plant growth and development, and is frequently limiting. By contrast, over-accumulation of Fe in plant tissues leads to toxicity. In soils, the distribution of Fe is highly heterogeneous. To cope with this heterogeneity, plant roots engage an array of adaptive responses to adjust their morphology and physiology. In this article, we review root morphological and physiological changes in response to low- and high-Fe conditions and highlight differences between these responses. We especially focus on the role of the root apex in dealing with the stresses resulting from Fe shortage and excess. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 43% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,447,592
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,788
of 20,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,982
of 299,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#323
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.