↓ Skip to main content

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS): Beneficial Companions of Plants’ Developmental Processes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS): Beneficial Companions of Plants’ Developmental Processes
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01299
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachana Singh, Samiksha Singh, Parul Parihar, Rohit K. Mishra, Durgesh K. Tripathi, Vijay P. Singh, Devendra K. Chauhan, Sheo M. Prasad

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated inevitably in the redox reactions of plants, including respiration and photosynthesis. In earlier studies, ROS were considered as toxic by-products of aerobic pathways of the metabolism. But in recent years, concept about ROS has changed because they also participate in developmental processes of plants by acting as signaling molecules. In plants, ROS regulate many developmental processes such as cell proliferation and differentiation, programmed cell death, seed germination, gravitropism, root hair growth and pollen tube development, senescence, etc. Despite much progress, a comprehensive update of advances in the understanding of the mechanisms evoked by ROS that mediate in cell proliferation and development are fragmentry and the matter of ROS perception and the signaling cascade remains open. Therefore, keeping in view the above facts, an attempt has been made in this article to summarize the recent findings regarding updates made in the regulatory action of ROS at various plant developmental stages, which are still not well-known.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 305 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 19%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Master 35 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 86 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 16%
Environmental Science 9 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 104 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,473,108
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,831
of 20,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,209
of 322,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#244
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.