↓ Skip to main content

Titanium as a Beneficial Element for Crop Production

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Titanium as a Beneficial Element for Crop Production
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiheng Lyu, Xiangying Wei, Jianjun Chen, Cun Wang, Xiaoming Wang, Dongming Pan

Abstract

Titanium (Ti) is considered a beneficial element for plant growth. Ti applied via roots or leaves at low concentrations has been documented to improve crop performance through stimulating the activity of certain enzymes, enhancing chlorophyll content and photosynthesis, promoting nutrient uptake, strengthening stress tolerance, and improving crop yield and quality. Commercial fertilizers containing Ti, such as Tytanit and Mg-Titanit, have been used as biostimulants for improving crop production; however, mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects still remain unclear. In this article, we propose that the beneficial roles Ti plays in plants lie in its interaction with other nutrient elements primarily iron (Fe). Fe and Ti have synergistic and antagonistic relationships. When plants experience Fe deficiency, Ti helps induce the expression of genes related to Fe acquisition, thereby enhancing Fe uptake and utilization and subsequently improving plant growth. Plants may have proteins that either specifically or nonspecifically bind with Ti. When Ti concentration is high in plants, Ti competes with Fe for ligands or proteins. The competition could be severe, resulting in Ti phytotoxicity. As a result, the beneficial effects of Ti become more pronounced during the time when plants experience low or deficient Fe supply.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 69 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 23%
Chemistry 16 8%
Environmental Science 15 7%
Engineering 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 81 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,420,901
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,576
of 20,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,997
of 310,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#103
of 584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,986 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.