Title |
RNA Interference: A Novel Source of Resistance to Combat Plant Parasitic Nematodes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.00834 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sagar Banerjee, Anamika Banerjee, Sarvajeet S. Gill, Om P. Gupta, Anil Dahuja, Pradeep K. Jain, Anil Sirohi |
Abstract |
Plant parasitic nematodes cause severe damage and yield loss in major crops all over the world. Available control strategies include use of insecticides/nematicides but these have proved detrimental to the environment, while other strategies like crop rotation and resistant cultivars have serious limitations. This scenario provides an opportunity for the utilization of technological advances like RNA interference (RNAi) to engineer resistance against these devastating parasites. First demonstrated in the model free living nematode, Caenorhabtidis elegans; the phenomenon of RNAi has been successfully used to suppress essential genes of plant parasitic nematodes involved in parasitism, nematode development and mRNA metabolism. Synthetic neurotransmitants mixed with dsRNA solutions are used for in vitro RNAi in plant parasitic nematodes with significant success. However, host delivered in planta RNAi has proved to be a pioneering phenomenon to deliver dsRNAs to feeding nematodes and silence the target genes to achieve resistance. Highly enriched genomic databases are exploited to limit off target effects and ensure sequence specific silencing. Technological advances like gene stacking and use of nematode inducible and tissue specific promoters can further enhance the utility of RNAi based transgenics against plant parasitic nematodes. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 29% |
New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
India | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
Researcher | 16 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 17% |
Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 17% |
Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 39 | 27% |