↓ Skip to main content

Agronomic Evaluation of Sorghum Hybrids for Silage Production Cultivated in Semiarid Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Agronomic Evaluation of Sorghum Hybrids for Silage Production Cultivated in Semiarid Conditions
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre F. Perazzo, Gleidson G. P. Carvalho, Edson M. Santos, Higor F. C. Bezerra, Thiago C. Silva, Gildenia A. Pereira, Rosângela C. S. Ramos, José A. S. Rodrigues

Abstract

The aim of this study was to study the agronomic traits of different Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench hybrids for silage productionin semiarid conditions. It was a 1-year evaluation conducted in a randomized block design with 24 treatments and three replicates. The treatments were sorghum hybrids developed by the breeding program of "Embrapa Milho e Sorgo" (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation). The fresh matter yield (FMY) in the first cut varied from 22,643.56 to 44,033.15 kg/ha, with an average of 32,607.37 kg/ha, leading to the formation of two groups. Similar results were observed for the dry matter yield (DMY), in which the highest group yielded from 9,471.32 to 14,540.23 kg/ha dry matter (DM). For plant regrowth, there was an increase in the number of stems and a decrease in the amount of panicles. Two groups were formed for the accumulated dry matter yield (ADMY), averaging 14,217.91 kg/ha; the highest group showed mean values of 18,003.00 to 14,221.94 kg/ha. The evaluated sorghum hybrids exhibited satisfactory accumulated forage yields due to their high yield in regrowth, which indicates that they are suitable for use in animal production systems in semi-arid regions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 24 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 26 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,909,758
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12,189
of 20,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,787
of 316,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#396
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.