The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lack of S-RNase-Based Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility in Orchids Suggests That This System Evolved after the Monocot-Eudicot Split
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.01106 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shan-Ce Niu, Jie Huang, Yong-Qiang Zhang, Pei-Xing Li, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Qing Xu, Li-Jun Chen, Jie-Yu Wang, Yi-Bo Luo, Zhong-Jian Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 58% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 21% |
Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,580,718
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,904
of 20,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,874
of 316,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#156
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,751 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.