↓ Skip to main content

Metabolomics for Plant Improvement: Status and Prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
458 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolomics for Plant Improvement: Status and Prospects
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rakesh Kumar, Abhishek Bohra, Arun K. Pandey, Manish K. Pandey, Anirudh Kumar

Abstract

Post-genomics era has witnessed the development of cutting-edge technologies that have offered cost-efficient and high-throughput ways for molecular characterization of the function of a cell or organism. Large-scale metabolite profiling assays have allowed researchers to access the global data sets of metabolites and the corresponding metabolic pathways in an unprecedented way. Recent efforts in metabolomics have been directed to improve the quality along with a major focus on yield related traits. Importantly, an integration of metabolomics with other approaches such as quantitative genetics, transcriptomics and genetic modification has established its immense relevance to plant improvement. An effective combination of these modern approaches guides researchers to pinpoint the functional gene(s) and the characterization of massive metabolites, in order to prioritize the candidate genes for downstream analyses and ultimately, offering trait specific markers to improve commercially important traits. This in turn will improve the ability of a plant breeder by allowing him to make more informed decisions. Given this, the present review captures the significant leads gained in the past decade in the field of plant metabolomics accompanied by a brief discussion on the current contribution and the future scope of metabolomics to accelerate plant improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 458 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 17%
Researcher 68 15%
Student > Master 63 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Student > Bachelor 25 5%
Other 67 15%
Unknown 123 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 179 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 16%
Chemistry 28 6%
Engineering 7 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 <1%
Other 25 5%
Unknown 143 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,240,704
of 26,104,555 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,995
of 24,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,508
of 332,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#130
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,104,555 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,996 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.