You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
UAV-Based Thermal Imaging for High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Black Poplar Response to Drought
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.01681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Ludovisi, Flavia Tauro, Riccardo Salvati, Sacha Khoury, Giuseppe Mugnozza Scarascia, Antoine Harfouche |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 38% |
| Engineering | 25 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 75 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,929,390
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,390
of 24,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,321
of 332,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#156
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.