The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative Resistance to Plant Pathogens in Pyramiding Strategies for Durable Crop Protection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.01838 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Laure Pilet-Nayel, Benoît Moury, Valérie Caffier, Josselin Montarry, Marie-Claire Kerlan, Sylvain Fournet, Charles-Eric Durel, Régine Delourme |
| Abstract |
Quantitative resistance has gained interest in plant breeding for pathogen control in low-input cropping systems. Although quantitative resistance frequently has only a partial effect and is difficult to select, it is considered more durable than major resistance (R) genes. With the exponential development of molecular markers over the past 20 years, resistance QTL have been more accurately detected and better integrated into breeding strategies for resistant varieties with increased potential for durability. This review summarizes current knowledge on the genetic inheritance, molecular basis, and durability of quantitative resistance. Based on this knowledge, we discuss how strategies that combine major R genes and QTL in crops can maintain the effectiveness of plant resistance to pathogens. Combining resistance QTL with complementary modes of action appears to be an interesting strategy for breeding effective and potentially durable resistance. Combining quantitative resistance with major R genes has proven to be a valuable approach for extending the effectiveness of major genes. In the plant genomics era, improved tools and methods are becoming available to better integrate quantitative resistance into breeding strategies. Nevertheless, optimal combinations of resistance loci will still have to be identified to preserve resistance effectiveness over time for durable crop protection. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 293 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 19% |
| Researcher | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 79 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 149 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 89 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,232,378
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,277
of 21,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,645
of 329,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#87
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.