↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship between Insect Resistance and Tree Age of Transgenic Triploid Populus tomentosa Plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relationship between Insect Resistance and Tree Age of Transgenic Triploid Populus tomentosa Plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yachao Ren, Jun Zhang, Guiying Wang, Xiaojie Liu, Li Li, Jinmao Wang, Minsheng Yang

Abstract

To explore the stability of insect resistance during the development of transgenic insect-resistant trees, this study investigated how insect resistance changes as transgenic trees age. We selected 19 transgenic insect-resistant triploidPopulus tomentosalines as plant material. The presence of exogenous genes and Cry1Ac protein expression were verified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analyses. The toxicity forClostera anachoretaandLymantria disparwas evaluated by feeding fresh leaves to first instar larvae after the trees were planted in the field for 2 years and after the sixth year. Results of PCR showed that the exogenous genes had a long-term presence in the poplar genome. ELISA analyses showed significant differences existed on the 6-year-old transgenic lines. The insect-feeding experiment demonstrated significant differences in the mortality rates ofC. anachoretaandL. disparamong different transgenic lines. The average corrected mortality rates ofC. anachoretaandL. disparranged from 5.6-98.7% to 35.4-7.2% respectively. The larval mortality rates differed significantly between the lines at different ages. Up to 52.6% of 1-year-old transgenic lines and 42.1% of 2-year-old transgenic lines causedC. anachoretalarval mortality rates to exceed 80%, whereas only 26.3% of the 6-year-old transgenic lines. The mortality rates ofL. disparexhibited the same trend: 89.5% of 1-year-old transgenic lines and 84.2% of 2-year-old transgenic lines causedL. disparlarval mortality rates to exceed 80%; this number decreased to 63.2% for the 6-year-old plants. The proportion of 6-year-old trees with over 80% larval mortality rates was clearly lower than that of the younger trees. The death distribution ofC. anachoretain different developmental stages also showed the larvae that fed on the leaves of 1-year-old trees were killed mostly during L1and L2stages, whereas the proportion of larvae that died in L3and L4stages was significantly increased when fed on leaves of 6-year-old trees. Results of correlation analysis showed there was a significant correlation between the larvae mortality rates of trees at different ages, as well as between Cry1Ac protein contents and larvae mortality rates of 6-year-old trees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Environmental Science 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,932,482
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12,235
of 20,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,736
of 440,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#304
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,556 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.