↓ Skip to main content

Nanobody-Directed Specific Degradation of Proteins by the 26S-Proteasome in Plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanobody-Directed Specific Degradation of Proteins by the 26S-Proteasome in Plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bianca Baudisch, Ingrid Pfort, Eberhard Sorge, Udo Conrad

Abstract

Here, we present data showing the directed degradation of target proteins recognized by a specific nanobody in transgenic plants. Green fluorescent protein was depleted by a chimeric nanobody fused to a distinct F-box domain, which enables protein degradationviathe ubiquitin proteasome pathway. This technique could thus be used to knock out other proteins of interestin plantausing specific, high-affinity binding proteins.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Chemistry 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,641,800
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,081
of 20,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,269
of 442,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#349
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,713 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.