The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plastid Genome Evolution in the Early-Diverging Legume Subfamily Cercidoideae (Fabaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yin-Huan Wang, Susann Wicke, Hong Wang, Jian-Jun Jin, Si-Yun Chen, Shu-Dong Zhang, De-Zhu Li, Ting-Shuang Yi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 23% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 23% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,643,834
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,954
of 21,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,771
of 440,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#138
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,047 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.