The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 Inhibits Leaf Senescence in Arabidopsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi Song, Yupei Jiang, Benke Kuai, Lin Li |
| Abstract |
Leaf senescence is an integral part of plant development, and the timing and progressing rate of senescence could substantially affect the yield and quality of crops. It has been known that a circadian rhythm synchronized with external environmental cues is critical for the optimal coordination of various physiological and metabolic processes. However, the reciprocal interactions between the circadian clock and leaf senescence in plants remain unknown. Here, through measuring the physiological and molecular senescence related markers of several circadian components mutants, we found that CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 inhibits leaf senescence. Further molecular and genetic studies revealed that CCA1 directly activatesGLK2and suppressesORE1expression to counteract leaf senescence. As plants age, the expression and periodic amplitude ofCCA1declines and thus weakens the inhibition of senescence. Our findings reveal an age-dependent circadian clock component of the process of leaf senescence. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,622,209
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,802
of 21,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,669
of 333,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#115
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.