↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Association Studies of 11 Agronomic Traits in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Wide Association Studies of 11 Agronomic Traits in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shengkui Zhang, Xin Chen, Cheng Lu, Jianqiu Ye, Meiling Zou, Kundian Lu, Subin Feng, Jinli Pei, Chen Liu, Xincheng Zhou, Ping’an Ma, Zhaogui Li, Cuijuan Liu, Qi Liao, Zhiqiang Xia, Wenquan Wang

Abstract

Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a major tuberous crop produced worldwide. In this study, we sequenced 158 diverse cassava varieties and identified 349,827 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indels. In each chromosome, the number of SNPs and the physical length of the respective chromosome were in agreement. Population structure analysis indicated that this panel can be divided into three subgroups. Genetic diversity analysis indicated that the average nucleotide diversity of the panel was 1.21 × 10-4 for all sampled landraces. This average nucleotide diversity was 1.97 × 10-4, 1.01 × 10-4, and 1.89 × 10-4 for subgroups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis demonstrated that the average LD was about ∼8 kb. We evaluated 158 cassava varieties under 11 different environments. Finally, we identified 36 loci that were related to 11 agronomic traits by genome-wide association analyses. Four loci were associated with two traits, and 62 candidate genes were identified in the peak SNP sites. We found that 40 of these genes showed different expression profiles in different tissues. Of the candidate genes related to storage roots, Manes.13G023300, Manes.16G000800, Manes.02G154700, Manes.02G192500, and Manes.09G099100 had higher expression levels in storage roots than in leaf and stem; on the other hand, of the candidate genes related to leaves, Manes.05G164500, Manes.05G164600, Manes.04G057300, Manes.01G202000, and Manes.03G186500 had higher expression levels in leaves than in storage roots and stem. This study provides basis for research on genetics and the genetic improvement of cassava.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 33 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,508,366
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,056
of 20,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,692
of 327,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#265
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.