↓ Skip to main content

The Plant Phenology Ontology: A New Informatics Resource for Large-Scale Integration of Plant Phenology Data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Plant Phenology Ontology: A New Informatics Resource for Large-Scale Integration of Plant Phenology Data
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Stucky, Rob Guralnick, John Deck, Ellen G. Denny, Kjell Bolmgren, Ramona Walls

Abstract

Plant phenology - the timing of plant life-cycle events, such as flowering or leafing out - plays a fundamental role in the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, including human agricultural systems. Because plant phenology is often linked with climatic variables, there is widespread interest in developing a deeper understanding of global plant phenology patterns and trends. Although phenology data from around the world are currently available, truly global analyses of plant phenology have so far been difficult because the organizations producing large-scale phenology data are using non-standardized terminologies and metrics during data collection and data processing. To address this problem, we have developed the Plant Phenology Ontology (PPO). The PPO provides the standardized vocabulary and semantic framework that is needed for large-scale integration of heterogeneous plant phenology data. Here, we describe the PPO, and we also report preliminary results of using the PPO and a new data processing pipeline to build a large dataset of phenology information from North America and Europe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 57 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 30%
Environmental Science 23 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 65 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,320,368
of 26,390,482 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,101
of 25,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,457
of 343,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#50
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,390,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.