You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New Era of Studying RNA Secondary Structure and Its Influence on Gene Regulation in Plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00671 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaofei Yang, Minglei Yang, Hongjing Deng, Yiliang Ding |
| Abstract |
The dynamic structure of RNA plays a central role in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression such as RNA maturation, degradation, and translation. With the rise of next-generation sequencing, the study of RNA structure has been transformed from in vitro low-throughput RNA structure probing methods to in vivo high-throughput RNA structure profiling. The development of these methods enables incremental studies on the function of RNA structure to be performed, revealing new insights of novel regulatory mechanisms of RNA structure in plants. Genome-wide scale RNA structure profiling allows us to investigate general RNA structural features over 10s of 1000s of mRNAs and to compare RNA structuromes between plant species. Here, we provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of: (i) RNA structure probing methods; (ii) the biological functions of RNA structure; (iii) genome-wide RNA structural features corresponding to their regulatory mechanisms; and (iv) RNA structurome evolution in plants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Brazil | 3 | 18% |
| Russia | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,525,660
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#514
of 21,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,513
of 331,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#17
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.