The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of Tomato WRKY Genes in Plant Responses to Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00801 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuling Bai, Sri Sunarti, Christos Kissoudis, Richard G. F. Visser, C. G. van der Linden |
| Abstract |
In the field, plants constantly face a plethora of abiotic and biotic stresses that can impart detrimental effects on plants. In response to multiple stresses, plants can rapidly reprogram their transcriptome through a tightly regulated and highly dynamic regulatory network where WRKY transcription factors can act as activators or repressors. WRKY transcription factors have diverse biological functions in plants, but most notably are key players in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. In tomato there are 83 WRKY genes identified. Here we review recent progress on functions of these tomato WRKY genes and their homologs in other plant species, such as Arabidopsis and rice, with a special focus on their involvement in responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. In particular, we highlight WRKY genes that play a role in plant responses to a combination of abiotic and biotic stresses. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Comoros | 1 | 14% |
| Argentina | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 74 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,413,628
of 23,332,901 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,591
of 21,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,674
of 329,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#131
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,332,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.