↓ Skip to main content

15N Natural Abundance Evidences a Better Use of N Sources by Late Nitrogen Application in Bread Wheat

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
15N Natural Abundance Evidences a Better Use of N Sources by Late Nitrogen Application in Bread Wheat
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00853
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa Fuertes-Mendizábal, José M. Estavillo, Miren K. Duñabeitia, Ximena Huérfano, Ander Castellón, Carmen González-Murua, Ana Aizpurua, María Begoña González-Moro

Abstract

This work explores whether the natural abundance of N isotopes technique could be used to understand the movement of N within the plant during vegetative and grain filling phases in wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.) under different fertilizer management strategies. We focus on the effect of splitting the same N dose through a third late amendment at flag leaf stage (GS37) under humid Mediterranean conditions, where high spring precipitations can guarantee the incorporation of the lately applied N to the soil-plant system in an efficient way. The results are discussed in the context of agronomic parameters as N content, grain yield and quality, and show that further splitting the same N dose improves the wheat quality and induces a better nitrogen use efficiency. The nitrogen isotopic natural abundance technique shows that N remobilization is a discriminating process that leads to an impoverishment in 15N of senescent leaves and grain itself. This technique also reflects the more efficient use of N resources (fertilizer and native soil-N) when plants receive a late N amendment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Other 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 38%
Environmental Science 8 12%
Engineering 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,641,800
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,081
of 20,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,546
of 328,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#358
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,713 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.