You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is Nitrogen a Key Determinant of Water Transport and Photosynthesis in Higher Plants Upon Drought Stress?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.01143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lei Ding, Zhifeng Lu, Limin Gao, Shiwei Guo, Qirong Shen |
| Abstract |
Drought stress is a major global issue limiting agricultural productivity. Plants respond to drought stress through a series of physiological, cellular, and molecular changes for survival. The regulation of water transport and photosynthesis play crucial roles in improving plants' drought tolerance. Nitrogen (N, ammonium and nitrate) is an essential macronutrient for plants, and it can affect many aspects of plant growth and metabolic pathways, including water relations and photosynthesis. This review focuses on how drought stress affects water transport and photosynthesis, including the regulation of hydraulic conductance, aquaporin expression, and photosynthesis. It also discusses the cross talk between N, water transport, and drought stress in higher plants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 19% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 55 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,045,852
of 24,662,675 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,035
of 23,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,670
of 338,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#61
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,662,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.