↓ Skip to main content

Rhamnolipids From Pseudomonas aeruginosa Are Elicitors Triggering Brassica napus Protection Against Botrytis cinerea Without Physiological Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rhamnolipids From Pseudomonas aeruginosa Are Elicitors Triggering Brassica napus Protection Against Botrytis cinerea Without Physiological Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noadya Monnier, Aurélien Furlan, Camille Botcazon, Abdellatif Dahi, Gaëlle Mongelard, Sylvain Cordelier, Christophe Clément, Stéphan Dorey, Catherine Sarazin, Sonia Rippa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Chemistry 3 3%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,090
of 20,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,637
of 331,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#372
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.