↓ Skip to main content

Delivery of Hairpin RNAs and Small RNAs Into Woody and Herbaceous Plants by Trunk Injection and Petiole Absorption

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delivery of Hairpin RNAs and Small RNAs Into Woody and Herbaceous Plants by Trunk Injection and Petiole Absorption
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01253
Pubmed ID
Authors

Athanasios Dalakouras, Wolfgang Jarausch, Guenther Buchholz, Alexandra Bassler, Mario Braun, Thorsten Manthey, Gabi Krczal, Michael Wassenegger

Abstract

Since its discovery, RNA interference has been widely used in crop protection. Recently, transgene-free procedures that were based on exogenous application of RNA molecules having the capacity to trigger RNAi in planta have been reported. Yet, efficient delivery of such RNA molecules to plants and particularly to trees poses major technical challenges. Here, we describe simple methods for efficient delivery of hairpin RNAs (hpRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to Malus domestica, Vitis vinifera, and Nicotiana benthamiana that are based on trunk injection and/or petiole absorption. The applied RNA molecules were efficiently taken up and systemically transported. In apical leaves, the RNA was already detectable 1 day post-application (dpa) and could be detected at least up to 10 dpa, depending on the method of application. Confocal microscopy revealed that the uptaken and systemically transported RNA molecules were strictly restricted to the xylem and apoplast which may illustrate why the applied hpRNAs were not processed into siRNAs by plant DICER-LIKE (DCL) endonucleases. These innovative methods may have great impact in pest management against chewing and/or xylem sap-feeding vectors and eukaryotic pathogens that reside in the xylem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 53 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 21%
Chemistry 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 58 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,909,859
of 24,796,678 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,831
of 23,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,913
of 339,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#112
of 456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,796,678 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.