↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative Analysis of Cadmium in Tobacco Roots Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy With Variable Index and Chemometrics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative Analysis of Cadmium in Tobacco Roots Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy With Variable Index and Chemometrics
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei Liu, Tingting Shen, Wenwen Kong, Jiyu Peng, Chi Zhang, Kunlin Song, Wei Wang, Chu Zhang, Yong He

Abstract

The study investigated some new developed variable indices and chemometrics for the fast detection of cadmium (Cd) in tobacco root samples by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. The variables selection methods of interval partial least squares (iPLS), backward interval partial least squares (BiPLS), and successive projections algorithm (SPA) were used to locate the optimal Cd emission line for univariate analysis and to select the maximal relevant variables for multivariate analysis. iPLS and BiPLS located 10 Cd emission lines to establish univariate analysis models. Univariate analysis model based on Cd I (508.58 nm) performed best with the coefficient of determination of prediction (Rp2) of 0.9426 and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 1.060 mg g-1. We developed two new variable indices to remove negative effects for Cd content prediction, including Index1 = (I508.58 + I361.05)/2 × I466.23 and Index2 = I508.58/I466.23 based on Cd emission lines at 508.58, 361.05, and 466.23 nm. Univariate model based on Index2 obtained better result (Rp2 of 0.9502 and RMSEP of 0.988 mg g-1) than univariate analysis based on the best Cd emission line at 508.58 nm. PLS and support vector machines (SVM) were adopted and compared for multivariate analysis. The results of multivariate analysis outperformed univariate analysis and the best quantitative model was achieved by the iPLS-SVM model (Rc2 of 0.9820, RMSECV of 0.214 mg g-1, Rp2 of 0.9759, and RMSEP of 0.712 mg g-1) using the maximal relevant variables in the range of 474-526 nm. The results indicated that LIBS coupled with new developed variable index and chemometrics could provide a feasible, effective, and economical approach for fast detecting Cd in tobacco roots.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,535,139
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,597
of 20,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,171
of 337,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#381
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.