The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dual or Not Dual?—Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Approaches to Study Organelle Targeting Specificity of Nuclear-Encoded Plant Proteins
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.01350 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mayank Sharma, Bationa Bennewitz, Ralf Bernd Klösgen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 22% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 26% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 26% |
Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,197,100
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,323
of 20,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,356
of 342,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#108
of 435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.