↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heike Molenaar, Robert Boehm, Hans-Peter Piepho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 15 17%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Psychology 3 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,024,132
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,448
of 20,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,355
of 352,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#293
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.