You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Radial Growth and Wood Density Reflect the Impacts and Susceptibility to Defoliation by Gypsy Moth and Climate in Radiata Pine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.01582 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesús Julio Camarero, Flor Álvarez-Taboada, Andrea Hevia, Fernando Castedo-Dorado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 46% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 31% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,465,635
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,311
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,422
of 367,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#73
of 475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.