The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical Evaluation of Strategies for the Production of Blood Coagulation Factors in Plant-Based Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2019.00261 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oguz Top, Ulrich Geisen, Eva L. Decker, Ralf Reski |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,400,998
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,270
of 24,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,033
of 359,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#137
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.