The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparison of Mainstream Genotyping Platforms for the Evaluation and Use of Barley Genetic Resources
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2019.00544 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benoit Darrier, Joanne Russell, Sara G. Milner, Pete E. Hedley, Paul D. Shaw, Malcolm Macaulay, Luke D. Ramsay, Claire Halpin, Martin Mascher, Delphine L. Fleury, Peter Langridge, Nils Stein, Robbie Waugh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,052,383
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,541
of 21,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,719
of 351,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#69
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.