↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomically Informed Scoring Enhances Confidence in Natural Products Annotation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taxonomically Informed Scoring Enhances Confidence in Natural Products Annotation
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.01329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriano Rutz, Miwa Dounoue-Kubo, Simon Ollivier, Jonathan Bisson, Mohsen Bagheri, Tongchai Saesong, Samad Nejad Ebrahimi, Kornkanok Ingkaninan, Jean-Luc Wolfender, Pierre-Marie Allard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 21 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 30 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,679,199
of 25,890,819 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,152
of 24,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,189
of 378,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#35
of 502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,890,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.