↓ Skip to main content

Lessons From 20 Years of Studies of Wheat Genotypes in Multiple Environments and Under Contrasting Production Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lessons From 20 Years of Studies of Wheat Genotypes in Multiple Environments and Under Contrasting Production Systems
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.01745
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan M. Herrera, Lilia Levy Häner, Fabio Mascher, Jürg Hiltbrunner, Dario Fossati, Cécile Brabant, Raphaël Charles, Didier Pellet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 39%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#18,714,452
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,195
of 20,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,229
of 451,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#364
of 451 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,930 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 451 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.