The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of Plant Beneficial Microbes: Overview of the Methodological Approaches for the Assessment of Root Colonization and Persistence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.00006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ida Romano, Valeria Ventorino, Olimpia Pepe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 20% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 65 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,902,104
of 23,952,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,183
of 22,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,413
of 455,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#161
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,952,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.