The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Phenotype Paradox: Lessons From Natural Transcriptome Evolution on How to Engineer Plants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.00075 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Justin Law, Kangbo Ng, Oliver P. F. Windram |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 8% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 32% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 21% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,430,404
of 23,952,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,376
of 22,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,967
of 363,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#86
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,952,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.