The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Water Stable Isotopes in Ecohydrological Field Research: Comparison Between In Situ and Destructive Monitoring Methods to Determine Soil Water Isotopic Signatures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.00387 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angelika Kübert, Sinikka Paulus, Adrian Dahlmann, Christiane Werner, Youri Rothfuss, Natalie Orlowski, Maren Dubbert |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,695,810
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,910
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,316
of 404,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#228
of 452 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.