↓ Skip to main content

Kinetic Modifications of C4 PEPC Are Qualitatively Convergent, but Larger in Panicum Than in Flaveria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Kinetic Modifications of C4 PEPC Are Qualitatively Convergent, but Larger in Panicum Than in Flaveria
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.01014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas R. Moody, Pascal-Antoine Christin, James D. Reid

Abstract

C4 photosynthesis results from a set of anatomical features and biochemical components that act together to concentrate CO2 within the leaf and boost productivity. This complex trait evolved independently many times, resulting in various realizations of the phenotype, but in all C4 plants the primary fixation of atmospheric carbon is catalyzed by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. Comparisons of C4 and non-C4 PEPC from a few closely related species suggested that the enzyme was modified to meet the demands of the C4 cycle. However, very few C4 groups have been investigated, hampering general conclusions. To test the hypothesis that distant C4 lineages underwent convergent biochemical changes, we compare the kinetic variation between C4 and non-C4 PEPC from a previously assessed young lineage (Flaveria, Asteraceae) with those from an older lineage found within the distantly related grass family (Panicum). Despite the evolutionary distance, the kinetic changes between the non-C4 and C4 PEPC are qualitatively similar, with a decrease in sensitivity for inhibitors, an increased specificity (k cat/K m) for bicarbonate, and a decreased specificity (k cat/K m) for PEP. The differences are more pronounced in the older lineage Panicum, which might indicate that optimization of PEPC for the C4 context increases with evolutionary time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,790,852
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,624
of 20,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,382
of 397,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#114
of 568 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,971 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 568 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.