The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Populations of the Parasitic Plant Phelipanche ramosa Influence Their Seed Microbiota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.01075 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Huet, Jean-Bernard Pouvreau, Erwan Delage, Sabine Delgrange, Coralie Marais, Muriel Bahut, Philippe Delavault, Philippe Simier, Lucie Poulin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,690,200
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,243
of 20,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,390
of 366,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#57
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.